So, my girlfriend sent me a link to an article written by Rabbi Schmuley. Actually, she sent it to my husband with this message:
Please pass these links to Trace…
…..and stand the hell back!!
http://www.beliefnet.com/story/194/story_19451_1.html
or the summarized version:
http://www.shmuley.com/articles.php?id=277
(…getting DD out of earshot might help too!!)
Now why did she think I would need some space? I am a reasonable, rational individual. Perhaps she knows my passion for sharing the experience of breastfeeding. Perhaps she knows I believe men should be active partners. Perhaps she knows my passion. I read Rabbi Schmuley`s article and I understand what statements my girlfriend believed would incense me. And to some degree they do. Like what you may ask? Well…
The first point that irks me is that Rabbi Schmuley considers breastfeeding to be a “de-eroticization of a woman’s body”. The comment that breastfeeding turns breasts, the “most attractive body parts into a feeding station, an attractive cafeteria rather than a scintillating piece of flesh” is ridiculous. Why can`t the breasts be both a scintillating pice of flesh and an attractive cafeteria? Why is it one or the other? Breastfeeding can most certainly be considered sexy (as he also says thanks goodness), but more so, any husband should look at his breastfeeding wife with pride not jealousy. A breastfeeding wife is doing something that only she can do (feed his child!), and something that many women can`t do despite giving it their all. Yes, breasts are sexy to look at, but they also provide an important function, a function that truly is more important that just being a pretty appendage. Really, in what Jewish Holy Book does it say that a woman’s breasts were made for the primary pleasure of her husband and not to feed her child? Please tell me! A woman’s body was made for the primary pleasure of man? Considering that only woman can bear and feed children, I would think the woman’s body was made to birth and feed babies, if she so chooses. I wasn’t aware that the Jewish faith was so focused on carnal pleasure, I should convert to Judaism!
The second point, likening extended breastfeeding to an extra-marital affair has to be taken humourously. Rabbi Schmuley says “when a mother gives her breasts to her son and takes them away from her husband, the effect on the marriage can feel the same.” What about giving her breasts to her daughter, does that change things? Considering breastfeeding takes anywhere from 20 minutes to an hour, I don’t think any woman is taking her breasts away from her husband for any amount of time that a man can’t handle. Are men that breast or sex obsessed that they can`t chill out during the short-lived breastfeeding run? The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reports that during the National Immunization Survey for 2004 only 41.5% of women were breastfeeding at 6 months which dropped to less than half at 12 months. Of the 30.5% of moms who breastfed exclusively to three months, only 11.3 were exclusively breastfeeding at 6 months as recommended by the APA and the WHO. Considering that virtually all new moms can breastfeed if they have accurate information and support, those numbers are tragically low. Women sacrifice their bodies and lifestyle for 40 weeks and longer to bring babies into the world, am I to suppose that men are so selfish that they can`t sacrifice having their wife`s breasts all to themselves for a lousy 3 months? Besides, if a woman “takes them away from her husband” for any extended amount of time, there is something else going on there that has nothing to do with breastfeeding. But this runs into the longer point.
“If breast-feeding gets in the way of the marriage—if it means that a husband and wife never go out on dates, or that the mother is so tired from always waking up with the baby that she has no energy to ever be intimate with her husband—the child will probably end up worse off”. First, even a formula fed baby will wake up in the middle of the night rendering the mom too tired to be intimate with her husband, so this argument doesn’t wash. Breast or bottle, babies wake up for a variety of reasons, not all of them stem from hunger. The only solution to keep a mom awake and her libido intact is to keep her in bed… asleep! Maybe dads should hire a night nurse to get up with the babies, whether breast- or bottle-fed. Maybe that will keep mom bright-eyed, bushy-tailed and ready to go.
The bigger issue here is blaming breastfeeding for the lack of intimacy in a marriage. If breastfeeding is contributing to the breakdown of a marriage, something was wrong with that marriage long before the breastfeeding started, maybe the under-lying issue should be dealt with instead of yammering on about the need to stop breastfeeding. Can breastfeeding lead a husband to stop seeing his wife as a woman and begin to see her as the mother of his children? Sure it can, but NEWS FLASH, she is both his wife and the mother of his children. Children CHANGE things: schedules, routine, lifestyle, family roles. If you don`t want things to change, you shouldn`t have children. Rabbi Schmuley says this change from wife to mother is “a negative trend that has begun in his mind that can only subvert his erotic interest.” It doesn`t have to be negative at all, what about loving your wife even more now that she is the mother of your children? What about finding her even sexier? Why must a woman lose her sex appeal for birthing and breastfeeding a baby when a man retains his even while his nightly snores wake up the neighbourhood?
Rabbi Schmuley concludes that breastfeeding “should always remain subordinate to the romantic and passionate needs of a marriage” especialy if it is contributing to the loss of erotic desire in the marriage. As I said before, if there is a loss of desire in the marriage, it most likely has nothing to do with breastfeeding. Deal with the real issues instead of finding a scapegoat. If breastfeeding should remain subordinate, I would certainly hope the husbands out there would have something extra-special to offer and entice with besides a generic roll in the sack. More often, the loss of desire in the bedroom is a result of boredom. Women may hide behind breastfeeding instead of hurting their husbands feelings. “Ì need to breastfeed” sounds much better than `Honey, you bore me in bed” even while it needs to be said. I certainly wouldn’t shun breastfeeding for a mechanized, automatic, predictable, lackluster romp in the sack - I’d prefer the oxytocin bliss to the predictability of “now we do this, and then this, and then this…” any day. Maybe my girlfriend was right… thank goodness I edit. I mean don’t even get me started about the men-shouldn’t-watch-the-birth-of-their-children-for-fear-of-de-eroticizing-the-crotch argument, good lord. I cannot say anymore, it’s almost midnight, my husband is in bed and I have to breastfeed my daughter.